Return-Path: Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net ([206.13.28.240]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 21:52:12 -0400 Received: from postoffice.pacbell.net ([206.170.7.223]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0FW00023QQQ9PE@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 18:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 18:52:22 -0700 From: fmoreno4@postoffice.pacbell.net Subject: Long Range Tank Progress - LIV To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-to: fmoreno4@pacbell.net Message-id: <39444256.30E4A4A8@postoffice.pacbell.net> References: <20000611040618.AAA1120@ns1.olsusa.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For all those interested, here is the progress report requested by Bill Hogerty. Recall that John Forker of Palo Alto is preparing to ferry Chris Toms's unpressurized LIV from New Zealand. After considering various alternatives, the leading candidate is a bladder tank shaped like a parallelogram to match the slope of the front and back seat backs (20 degree back slope) about 25 inches high. It would be constrained by a 5 sided box (four sides and bottom) about 20 inches high made of prepreg panels and reinforced against bending loads with uni-carbon strips added to the panels near the top edges. It would probably be assembled with a mix of piano hinges and screws to permit assembly in the fuselage as it will not fit through the door. The bladder supplier made a rough estimate of $1500 and initially said there were no economies for multiple buys, but we have not started the negotiation. The prepreg panel and other hardware would add another $500 or so. The filler cap would be offset to the front left to it would be easily accessible when the door is open. The problem is that for Chris' airplane the CG goes way aft of the limit when the tank is filled past about 90 gallons, so John is evaluating options including moving the battery and oxygen tank forward as these are currently installed aft for reasons unknown to us. Checking with others suggests that a hard flight limit is 1 inch aft of the rear CG limit as the airplane gets squirrely above 10-15,000 feet, and night and IFR flying are not recommended until burning off about 2 hours of fuel to get the CG where it belongs. Slowing to 250 knots makes 90 gallons adequate for the Pago Pago to Hawaii leg, the longest of the trip, when combined with 104 gallons in the wings. Today we reviewed drawings and did measurements in my fuselage to verify fit and location. We are trying for simplicity, and want to avoid a "tank well" in the passenger foot well area. This area could hold about 10 more gallons and permit the tank CG to move a bit forward. For those of you with CG data, one can do the evaluation by assuming that the rear tank CG is at about the same position as the rear passenger CG location. Remove the weight for the bottom and back cushions, add back 25 pounds (estimated) for the tank, then add as much fuel as you would like. The maximum (tallest tank) that allows a life raft to be folded and stored above the tank is about 123 gallons. John also found he could buy and modify a ham HF radio and get an antenna coupler that permits operation with automatic tuning regardless of the antenna length. Both packages total a bit less than $2K, and information is available on the Internet showing how to modify the radio to permit transmitter operation in the aircraft bands. The radio is compact, about 4" H by 10" W by about 12" deep. I have not seen the coupler assembly. John is currently thinking about using the KISS principle for the antenna which would exit the belly aft of the landing gear doors. Coil it up and tape it on to the belly. Taxi out to the runway. Get out and untape the antenna letting it trail, and then take off. Reverse procedure after taxiing off the runway. Avoids reels and such which represent single failure points. For much of the world, a Globalstar Telecommunications Inc. satellite phone (www.globalstar.com) would be the preferred option, and apparently works within 1800 miles of the mainland for North American, Europe, Asia, and Australia (in spite of the fact that their literature shows a 200 mile limit for international treaty reasons) and also covers the entire North Atlantic. But the air regulations mandate an HF radio. The satellite phone would be a nice back up, though. Gary Burns used an expensive earlier generation satellite phone when the HF radio took a holiday. In talking with a friend with United Air Lines who flew regularly to Hong Kong I learned that the expensive air liner HF radios are not that good, either, and they use sat phones to talk to their dispatchers. More reports will be forthcoming as we continue. Fred Moreno >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>