X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:17:43 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4586555 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:12:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.96; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZXeq1f00217dt5G59aBzkN; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:11:59 +0000 Received: from [10.26.249.140] ([166.205.140.251]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZaBc1f00G5ReU1i3ZaBhDw; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:11:52 +0000 References: <004601cb88bb$77129700$6537c500$@com> In-Reply-To: <004601cb88bb$77129700$6537c500$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A400) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-598776764 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Cc: "" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8A400) From: John Hafen Subject: Re: SW US GPS signal warning X-Original-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:11:36 -0800 X-Original-To: Mark Sletten --Apple-Mail-3-598776764 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Whatever it is, were not getting the full story. Interesting that a generic s= atellite test would only disrupt service around a sensitive military test ra= nge. =20 On Nov 20, 2010, at 6:01 AM, "Mark Sletten" wrote: > That=E2=80=99s in the middle of the Tonopah test range; I doubt very serio= usly the gov=E2=80=99t has any intent to nuke its most secure military aviat= ion test area. >=20 > =20 >=20 > More likely it is testing some form of signal denial technology (a device/= system designed to render GPS unavailable). >=20 > =20 >=20 > Mark Sletten >=20 > =20 >=20 > From: John Hafen [mailto:j.hafen@comcast.net]=20 > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:53 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: Re: [LML] SW US GPS signal warning >=20 > =20 >=20 > Look at the location of the outage. The epicenter. =20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > I wonder if setting off a nuclear weapon interferes somehow with GPS recep= tion. >=20 > =20 >=20 > JH >=20 > =20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > On Nov 19, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Rick Titsworth wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > FYI, FAA has posted an advisory here that will knock out GPS coverage for a= large portion of the southwestern US for a 4 hour period on 20 November. > =20 --Apple-Mail-3-598776764 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Whatever it is, were not getting the full story. Interesting that a generic satellite test would only disrupt service around a sensitive military test range.

On Nov 20, 2010, at 6:01 AM, "Mark Sletten" <mwsletten@gmail.com> wrote:

That’s in the middle of the Tonopah test range; I doubt very seriously the gov’t has any intent to nuke its most secure military aviation test area.

More likely it is testing some form of signal denial technology (a device/system designed to render GPS unavailable).

Mark Sletten

From: John Hafen [mailto:j.hafen@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:53 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] SW US GPS signal warning

Look at the location of the outage. The epicenter.

I wonder if setting off a nuclear weapon interferes somehow with GPS reception.

JH

On Nov 19, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Rick Titsworth wrote:

FYI, FAA has posted an advisory here that will knock out GPS coverage for a large portion of the southwestern US for a 4 hour period on 20 November.

--Apple-Mail-3-598776764--