X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:46:04 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTP id 4495371 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:55:51 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.163; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaout-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.66]) by imr-mb02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o96FtESu031659 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:55:14 -0400 Received: from [10.24.111.165] (unknown [166.205.142.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-mb02.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id E194AE00008B; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:55:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-Id: <163BC8D2-B1BC-4775-8CC3-545CA9FFF416@aol.com> From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B405) Subject: Re: [LML] Performance Engines Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B405) X-Original-Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:53:25 -0700 References: x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:352697280:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d29424cac9be05b83 X-AOL-IP: 166.205.142.159 My recommendation to all that have been burned by this individual is to = contact the FAA and complain about the unairworthy product put out by = Performance. You might make a difference and save someone's life. start = with the FSDO in your area or his. Jeff Edwards Sent from my iPad On Oct 6, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Mark Davis wrote: > The recent posts regarding Performance Engines "issues" caused me to = again look at my own experiences with them. These posts proved to be = the last straw that have now resulted in my losing complete confidence = in the Performance Engines Lycoming IO-540 installed in my Legacy. I am = now in the process of having the engine overhauled, despite the fact = that it runs very well, with just over 100 hours time on it. I can no = longer accept the potential but unknown risks that I must unfortunately = admit I've been rationalizing as minor issues for those 100 hours. >=20 > I originally chose to buy my engine from Performance based on positive = recommendations and a personal visit to their shop (quite impressive). = My first inkling of problems was while flow checking the fuel injection = system prior to first start. The fuel side seal of the Romec engine = fuel pump (listed as overhauled on my purchase invoice) flowed fuel thru = the seal vent at least as fast as thru the injectors when using the = electric fuel pump. I contacted Performance considering it a warranty = item to which they agreed. I was told to remove and return the pump and = they would replace it within about a week. Researching the fuel pump = I'd removed found that there was a recurrent AD on the model installed = on the engine that requiring re torquing the screws on the cover at = first 25 hours and then 50 hour intervals. Given the location on the = engine and the significant hassle of complying with the AD, I first = asked Performance why I had not been provided a modified AD free pump = and was told that what I had was considered serviceable and met our = purchase contract agreement for all parts to be new or overhauled. I = offered to pay the cost difference between the AD pump and am AD free = modified one. This was verbally agreed to by phone and I was told that = I could expect to receive a replacement pump shortly. That was the next = to last telephone contact I had with them. I was then faced with no = further phone contact despite numerous calls which were either not = answered or not returned over a several week period (apparently similar = to recent post experience). I then made a phone call using a friend's = phone which was answered right away. After a short unproductive = discussion about when I might receive a replacement pump, I asked to = have my original pump returned and that I would deal with the problem = myself. The pump was returned within about 2 days and I sent it to a = well known repair facility in OK. As part of part of my return of the = original pump for the core charge, I was informed that, in their = opinion, the original pump had not, in fact, been overhauled and was not = serviceable. This whole process cost me nearly $2K which I felt should = have been covered under warranty. >=20 > Since first startup the engine has leaked oil from all 6 cylinder = bases (heavier from cylinders 1 and 2 and weeping from the other 4). In = addition there has been a case seam (parting line) leak forward of the = sump which is enough that after an oil change without running the = engine, a small amount of oil appears on the floor or cowling within = about a day under that area of the parting line. I have tried some = sealing efforts on these leaks on the advice of several A&P's with = little success. I have not contacted Performance as I will no longer = attempt to do any business with them. >=20 > After installing the newly overhauled fuel pump from OK noted above, = shortly after engine start, I found a few drops of fluid from the same = fuel pump seal vent line which, in this case, proved to be oil vice = 100LL. The seal from the accessory case drive to fuel pump continues to = have a small weep of oil. >=20 > My Legacy is now down for engine teardown and any necessary repair. >=20 > Mark Davis > Legacy N422MD > San Diego, CA >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html