X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:41:57 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from webmail1.lsn.net ([66.90.138.156] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTPS id 4488465 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:13:39 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.90.138.156; envelope-from=mmcmanus@grandecom.net Received: from localhost (webmail1.lsn.net [127.0.0.1]) by webmail1.lsn.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o912D2q3026690 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:13:02 -0500 Received: from 66-90-221-27.dyn.grandenetworks.net (66-90-221-27.dyn.grandenetworks.net [66.90.221.27]) by webmail.grandecom.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:13:02 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <20100930211302.14083jknznvu1t4e@webmail.grandecom.net> X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:13:02 -0500 From: mmcmanus@grandecom.net X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Thunder Mustang Crash at Reno References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Originating-IP: 66.90.221.27 I carry both an axe and a 9" saw that folds up like a pocket knife =20 (Home Depot). Not sure if either one would work but it would give me =20 something to do during the fire. :) Matt McManus LNC2 360 Quoting randy snarr : > I would think the last thing you would ever want it an LNC2 is to =20 > end upside down. > The thought of that terrifies me. > Now that I think of it, anyone have a good line on light weight saw =20 > that you could use to cut yourself out? I will be velcroing it to =20 > the back of the passenger seat.. > > Randy Snarr > N694RS > > "Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and =20 > insignificant, if not utterly impossible" > -Simon Newcomb, 1902 > > --- On Wed, 9/29/10, Douglas Brunner wrote: > > From: Douglas Brunner > Subject: [LML] Re: Thunder Mustang Crash at Reno > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 5:31 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a cartwheel is the LAST thing you would want. > > =A0 > > I also vote for a minimal airspeed landing on the gear or a > belly slide with the gear up. > > =A0 > > > > > > From: Lancair Mailing > List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Kennedy > > Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:33 AM > > To: lml@lancaironline.net > > Subject: [LML] Re: Thunder Mustang Crash at Reno > > > > > > =A0 > > Hmm, an intentional cartwheel as an > emergency procedure. May be true, but I won't be trying it. I'll vote for = a > minimum energy/airspeed touchdown on the belly or mains. > > > > Bill Kennedy > > > > > > > > To: lml@lancaironline.net > > Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:46:17 -0400 > > From: mcmess1919@yahoo.com > > Subject: [LML] Thunder Mustang Crash at Reno > > > > There > was an seminar at Sun and Fun years ago where they talked about how =20 > to best crash > an airplane without a suitable place to land...and this guy did it...a > cartwheel.=A0 The energy is dissipated more slowly and the G Forces are > minimized.=A0 They looked at a number of crashes and found that in those > that cartwheeled, the pilot walked away. =A0Your comments? > > =A0 > > Steve > Colwell=A0=A0 Legacy > > http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcpq-092110-pilot-survives,0,646191.story?track= =3Drss > > > > > > > > > > >