X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:51:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.100.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTP id 4450505 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:09:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.100.31; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (imo-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.136]) by imr-ma05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o7VE8Kkn027031 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:08:20 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.bf7.7e891a72 (34921) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:08:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-me01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-me01.mx.aol.com [64.12.95.102]) by cia-da03.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA036-b2944c7d0ccda0; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:08:15 -0400 Received: from Webmail-d125 (webmail-d125.sim.aol.com [205.188.252.73]) by smtprly-me01.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYME014-b2944c7d0ccda0; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:08:13 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Pitot Tubes and AoA X-Original-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:08:13 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 75.62.74.216 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CD172D15D779C9_4404_839F_Webmail-d125.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32447-STANDARD Received: from 75.62.74.216 by Webmail-d125.sysops.aol.com (205.188.252.73) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:08:13 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CD172D15D055A6-4404-4F4C@Webmail-d125.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CD172D15D779C9_4404_839F_Webmail-d125.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" rob, he probably forgot to mention that the engine "ground to a halt" and could= not be restarted.....the pilot knew he was over the water.... jeff -----Original Message----- From: rwolf99@aol.com To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Tue, Aug 31, 2010 7:52 am Subject: [LML] Re: Pitot Tubes and AoA Lorn writes: =20 <> =20 I think he's referring to a PC-12 that ditched in the Sea of Japan about= 10 years ago. My office mate at Aviation Technology Group (the company= attorney) was one of the attorneys for Pilatus on that one. He told me= that the chip detector light illuminated so the pilot performed a precaut= ionary engine shutdown. Too bad he was 100 miles offshore in a single eng= ine airplane at the time. =20 I agree with Lorn -- a second pitot tube probably wasn't much help... =20 - Rob Wolf =20 ----------MB_8CD172D15D779C9_4404_839F_Webmail-d125.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
rob,
 
he probably forgot to mention that the engine "ground to a halt" and= could not be restarted.....the pilot knew he was over the water....
 
jeff



-----Original Message-----
From: rwolf99@aol.com
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tue, Aug 31, 2010 7:52 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Pitot Tubes and AoA

Lorn writes:
 
<<I bet that those dual AOAs sure helped ditch in the Pacific= a few years ago.>>
 
I think he's referring to a PC-12 that ditched in the Sea of Japan ab= out 10 years ago.  My office mate at Aviation Technology Group (the= company attorney) was one of the attorneys for Pilatus on that one. = He told me that the chip detector light illuminated so the pilot performe= d a precautionary engine shutdown.  Too bad he was 100 miles offshore= in a single engine airplane at the time.
 
I agree with Lorn -- a second pitot tube probably wasn't much help...=
 
- Rob Wolf


 
----------MB_8CD172D15D779C9_4404_839F_Webmail-d125.sysops.aol.com--