X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:22:14 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4447654@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <carbonflier@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pv0-f180.google.com ([74.125.83.180] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8)
  with ESMTP id 4447630 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:49:01 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.83.180; envelope-from=carbonflier@gmail.com
Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so2715118pvc.25
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Ap922FNkyvPmDZTmusH8IuEf/DMX6Ios2IiEY/gTPXDbhJerT2scHoHWFQGq7V7O7b
         bBQdkQ84jEknAPq3zA3Yn7V2fzPh+Au9LXKsFc4x/K+HjVWFL07Rq/89GBPdHaoZs2ig
         6cYuG9NgUt59ZUQ1kH6HvpyxxstVk1nGumcnc=
Received: by 10.143.5.20 with SMTP id h20mr3645983wfi.232.1283107706745;
        Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Return-Path: <carbonflier@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.0.169] (host-174-45-251-39.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net [174.45.251.39])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x31sm7520096wfd.19.2010.08.29.11.48.25
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <4C7AAB6F.7020104@gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:48:15 -0600
From: David Standish <carbonflier@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: billhogarty <billhogarty@hughes.net>, 
 Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Engine replace
References: <redirect-4447126@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <redirect-4447126@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I have head or read two opinions.  One is strict time life limit as you 
suggest the other is "replace on condition"
Replacements will be a couple grand although a small price to pay when 
considering what is at stake.

David S.



billhogarty wrote:
> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">
> Arnt the hoses life limited to 5 years??
>
> Bill H.
> </div>