X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:45:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snt0-omc3-s29.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.168] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4175826 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:58:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.90.168; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from SNT112-DS12 ([65.55.90.136]) by snt0-omc3-s29.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:58:10 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [24.216.229.86] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re:Lancair 235 X-Original-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:57:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0B3C_01CACA5E.8A37A6C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V10.00.0070.1500 Seal-Send-Time: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:57:51 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2010 14:58:10.0064 (UTC) FILETIME=[40DEF100:01CACA99] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0B3C_01CACA5E.8A37A6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The comparison using manifold pressure may not be very applicable as a = majority of 235 and 235/320's have fixed pitch props. It would be an interesting speed test for a 235/320 (fixed pitch) and a = 320 to fly together at the same RPM with the 320 adjusting the prop to = the same manifold pressure indicated in the 235/320. Although the = variable would be what length, pitch and manufacturer the 235/320 prop = has. Gary Edwards =20 Say Lorn, In your matrix (LancairCostSpec.jpg) you show speed and gph. For these figures, were all aircraft operated at the same rpm & manifold = pressure? Or percent horsepower? Jim ------=_NextPart_000_0B3C_01CACA5E.8A37A6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The comparison using manifold pressure may not be very applicable = as a=20 majority of 235 and 235/320's have fixed pitch props.
 
It would be an interesting speed test for a 235/320 (fixed = pitch) and=20 a 320 to fly together at the same RPM with the 320 adjusting the prop to = the=20 same manifold pressure indicated in the 235/320.  Although the = variable=20 would be what length, pitch and manufacturer the 235/320 prop = has.
 
Gary Edwards
   
Say Lorn,
In your matrix (LancairCostSpec.jpg) you show speed = and gph.=20 For these
figures, were all aircraft operated at the same rpm & = manifold pressure? Or
percent=20 horsepower?
Jim
------=_NextPart_000_0B3C_01CACA5E.8A37A6C0--