X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:38:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3869777 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:24:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=QDCNCEkvSttNok8B9zURiPq0BBjA3BkmPCunw2JDPonI1t88qv0CvdOjf6/2+89W; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Msor2-0006vd-5K for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:23:44 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <023401ca4175$0875aff0$5c8c020a@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: backup batteries X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:23:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0231_01CA4153.811C7FA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940a062e6e477b783c815a76af7621c0e70350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0231_01CA4153.811C7FA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable scrutinizing the bc102 I have in my plane I'm not thrilled with the = physical connection and am thinking about swapping something else in. Two candidates are the ultrastart red by atp and the yuasa yt7b-bs. = Their main qualifying characteristics are that they might fit in the = box. I was wondering if anyone on the list has experience with either of = these or other little batteries. ------=_NextPart_000_0231_01CA4153.811C7FA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

scrutinizing the bc102 I have in my = plane I'm not=20 thrilled with the physical connection and am thinking about swapping = something=20 else in.

Two candidates are the ultrastart red = by atp and=20 the yuasa yt7b-bs. Their main qualifying characteristics are = that=20 they might fit in the box.

I was wondering if anyone on the list = has=20 experience with either of these or other little=20 batteries.

------=_NextPart_000_0231_01CA4153.811C7FA0--