X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:37:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rg5.comporium.net ([208.104.2.25] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTPS id 3680257 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:14:52 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.104.2.25; envelope-from=snopercod@citcom.net Received: from 60.116.58.67.dsl.brvdnc.dynamic.citcom.Net (EHLO _67.58.116.60_) ([67.58.116.60]) by rg5.comporium.net (MOS 3.8.4-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRO04694 (AUTH snopercod); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:14:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <4A32388A.2010009@citcom.net> X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:14:18 -0400 From: John Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: Oildyne thermal overload Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/70, host=rg5.comporium.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090207.4A323888.0086,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=67.58.116.60, so=2007-03-13 10:31:19, dmn=5.7.1/2009-06-05 Greyhawk-- Thanks for the updated Oildyne information showing the internal 50A thermal overload. That *was* news to me, since my 1987 data sheet reads: "Motor has 100A internal circuit breaker". Since I purchased my kit in 1987, now I'm wondering whether my hydraulic pump has the 50A thermal overload or the 100A circuit breaker. IOW, did Oildyne make a change to their hardware, or just neglect to include the proper terminology on the 1987 data sheet?