X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:13:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s12.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.87] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3637485 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 09 May 2009 22:30:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.87; envelope-from=curtsuecannon@hotmail.com Received: from BLU133-W51 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s12.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 9 May 2009 19:29:44 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: curtsuecannon@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_fa3d970e-0c7b-43f0-9e4e-f73163ddf89b_" X-Originating-IP: [72.208.251.187] From: Curt Cannon X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Re: Performance Engines X-Original-Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:29:44 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2009 02:29:44.0525 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E22B7D0:01C9D117] --_fa3d970e-0c7b-43f0-9e4e-f73163ddf89b_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Add me to the list. I agree with what Robert said. If I were to deal with = them again=2C I'd use an escrow agent. Once Performance had my money=2C th= ey stopped returning calls and emails. > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Sat=2C 9 May 2009 17:18:06 -0400 > From: lancair-esp@ustek.com > Subject: [LML] Re: Performance Engines >=20 > Bill=2C >=20 > Yes I feel your pain=2C as have others who dealt with Performance. After > going through the same mess that you are experiencing=2C I would have to > say that actually Ron et al are not crooks. REALLY crappy business > people perhaps but not crooks. I expect you will get your engine and > exhaust and it will work fine. Mine was missing a few small parts but > we got that sorted out. Mine came with a bent oil pressure relief valve > but Mark Mahnke diagnosed that. Then the engine ran fine until a valve > seat broke and sent compression to zero. Performance said to send it > back and they would turn it in 2 or 3 days. The 2-3 days turned into a > month=2C but I got it back and she runs as sweet as ever. And a no-charge > repair. =20 >=20 > I suggest that you start posting complaints on all the builders web > sites and ask those members to send Performance a note asking for them > to make good on their promise. If you are not a member then find a > buddy who is. When Ron and Stuart starts to get e-mails from builders > all over the country=2C Performance will take the time=2C move your proje= ct > up in priority=2C and get it done. It worked for me.=20 >=20 > Robert M. Simon > ES-P N301ES >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill [mailto:n5zq@verizon.net]=20 > Sent: Thursday=2C May 07=2C 2009 8:01 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: Performance Engines > . . . I bought and paid for a Performance Engines IO-550 engine=2C exhaus= t > system=2C MT propeller and govenor. . . . Over a year later=2C no parts a= nd > no explanation as to why. . . .=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml --_fa3d970e-0c7b-43f0-9e4e-f73163ddf89b_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Add me to the list. I agree with what Robert said. =3B If I were to dea= l with them again=2C I'd use an escrow agent. =3B Once Performance had = my money=2C they stopped returning calls and emails.

>=3B = To: lml@lancaironline.net
>=3B Date: Sat=2C 9 May 2009 17:18:06 -0400<= br>>=3B From: lancair-esp@ustek.com
>=3B Subject: [LML] Re: Performa= nce Engines
>=3B
>=3B Bill=2C
>=3B
>=3B Yes I feel yo= ur pain=2C as have others who dealt with Performance. After
>=3B goin= g through the same mess that you are experiencing=2C I would have to
>= =3B say that actually Ron et al are not crooks. REALLY crappy business
= >=3B people perhaps but not crooks. I expect you will get your engine an= d
>=3B exhaust and it will work fine. Mine was missing a few small pa= rts but
>=3B we got that sorted out. Mine came with a bent oil pressu= re relief valve
>=3B but Mark Mahnke diagnosed that. Then the engine = ran fine until a valve
>=3B seat broke and sent compression to zero. = Performance said to send it
>=3B back and they would turn it in 2 or 3= days. The 2-3 days turned into a
>=3B month=2C but I got it back and= she runs as sweet as ever. And a no-charge
>=3B repair.
>=3B <= br>>=3B I suggest that you start posting complaints on all the builders w= eb
>=3B sites and ask those members to send Performance a note asking = for them
>=3B to make good on their promise. If you are not a member = then find a
>=3B buddy who is. When Ron and Stuart starts to get e-ma= ils from builders
>=3B all over the country=2C Performance will take t= he time=2C move your project
>=3B up in priority=2C and get it done. = It worked for me.
>=3B
>=3B Robert M. Simon
>=3B ES-P N301= ES
>=3B
>=3B -----Original Message-----
>=3B From: Bill [ma= ilto:n5zq@verizon.net]
>=3B Sent: Thursday=2C May 07=2C 2009 8:01 AM<= br>>=3B To: lml@lancaironline.net
>=3B Subject: Performance Engines<= br>>=3B . . . I bought and paid for a Performance Engines IO-550 engine= =2C exhaust
>=3B system=2C MT propeller and govenor. . . . Over a year= later=2C no parts and
>=3B no explanation as to why. . . .
>=3B=
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B --
>=3B For archives and = unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
= --_fa3d970e-0c7b-43f0-9e4e-f73163ddf89b_--