X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:30:53 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from col0-omc3-s8.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.11) with ESMTP id 3391148 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:10:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.34.146; envelope-from=bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Received: from COL104-W49 ([65.55.34.137]) by col0-omc3-s8.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:09:42 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_55244f2a-fec8-41b9-b7d1-e2f76756a4fa_" X-Originating-IP: [71.111.142.10] From: Bill Kennedy X-Original-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Legacy W&B X-Original-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:09:41 -0800 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2008 23:09:42.0450 (UTC) FILETIME=[34EC2920:01C963C1] --_55244f2a-fec8-41b9-b7d1-e2f76756a4fa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think it can be completely arbitrary as long as it's properly documented. > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Sun=2C 21 Dec 2008 17:47:30 -0500 > From: aadamson@highrf.com > Subject: [LML] Legacy W&B >=20 > So=2C some of you know that I created a nice excel template to be used to= do > the W&B for a Legacy. A question has come up that I can't answer from th= e > information in the POH. >=20 > Is has to do with the "reference - starting point". =20 >=20 > Which way did you do your W&B and which way is the *correct* way. >=20 > a) Did you use the Firewall Joggle and the 64.625" ARM as the reference > point=2C taking all your other measurements from that and then doing the > adding and subtracting to get the actual ARM? >=20 > b) Did you use the tip of the spinner as FS 0" and measure everything fro= m > that point? >=20 > The manual suggests that you start with the 64.625 as the reference numbe= r > and I suspect that is the correct way as that would be a closer reference= to > the actual MAC=2C than the tip of the spinner which can vary quite a bit. > Take for example the MT prop/spinner it's a considerable different length > than the Hartzell. >=20 > So=2C which way is the correct way=2C and which did you use? >=20 > Lastly=2C when doing the baggage area ARM=2C did you use the published 14= 1" or > did you actually measure when the ARM is for the center of the baggage ar= ea? > Or did you just back calculate it? >=20 > Thanks in advance=2C I'd like to include a note in my spreadsheet and I'd= like > this reference for my own W&B >=20 > Alan Adamson > Atlanta=2C GA > Legacy FG - IO550 in carbon >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml --_55244f2a-fec8-41b9-b7d1-e2f76756a4fa_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think it can be completely arbitrary as long as it's properly documented.=

>=3B To: lml@lancaironline.net
>=3B Date: Sun=2C 21 Dec 2008= 17:47:30 -0500
>=3B From: aadamson@highrf.com
>=3B Subject: [LML= ] Legacy W&=3BB
>=3B
>=3B So=2C some of you know that I creat= ed a nice excel template to be used to do
>=3B the W&=3BB for a Leg= acy. A question has come up that I can't answer from the
>=3B informa= tion in the POH.
>=3B
>=3B Is has to do with the "reference - st= arting point".
>=3B
>=3B Which way did you do your W&=3BB a= nd which way is the *correct* way.
>=3B
>=3B a) Did you use the = Firewall Joggle and the 64.625" ARM as the reference
>=3B point=2C tak= ing all your other measurements from that and then doing the
>=3B addi= ng and subtracting to get the actual ARM?
>=3B
>=3B b) Did you u= se the tip of the spinner as FS 0" and measure everything from
>=3B th= at point?
>=3B
>=3B The manual suggests that you start with the = 64.625 as the reference number
>=3B and I suspect that is the correct = way as that would be a closer reference to
>=3B the actual MAC=2C than= the tip of the spinner which can vary quite a bit.
>=3B Take for exam= ple the MT prop/spinner it's a considerable different length
>=3B than= the Hartzell.
>=3B
>=3B So=2C which way is the correct way=2C a= nd which did you use?
>=3B
>=3B Lastly=2C when doing the baggage= area ARM=2C did you use the published 141" or
>=3B did you actually m= easure when the ARM is for the center of the baggage area?
>=3B Or did= you just back calculate it?
>=3B
>=3B Thanks in advance=2C I'd = like to include a note in my spreadsheet and I'd like
>=3B this refere= nce for my own W&=3BB
>=3B
>=3B Alan Adamson
>=3B Atlant= a=2C GA
>=3B Legacy FG - IO550 in carbon
>=3B
>=3B
>= =3B --
>=3B For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/li= sts/lml/List.html
= --_55244f2a-fec8-41b9-b7d1-e2f76756a4fa_--