Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:36:26 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-3303795@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.66; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=NMMFLTE9YEKCS0CT4wwKkgCLU+Aq2KgRaEEIy8uOqMgrsCFkY3/jxAPNYIbUmPB9;
  h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
References: <list-3303210@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Fine Tuning EGT's
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tom,

at the risk of saying something you already know....

I wouldn't be looking at the absolute numbers at that fine level of detail.
If all cylinders peak near the same fuel, flow, that's the thing.  I would 
way have them peak together than have the same temp, if I can only have one.

If all cht's are well below 400, great.

Personally I don't think the quality of the probes and analog circuits is 
good enough to push really hard on the absolute numbers.
that said, some other ideas:

- does the problem move with the probe or stay with the cylinder?
- are all egt probes exactly the same distance from the cylinder?  same 
depth into pipe?  same angle into pipe?