Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #48323
From: Dr. Weinsweig <WeinsweigD@tsnci.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Oshkosh Accidents
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:50:52 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
i have found that on 2 of my visits to osh the 2nd time last week in my
propjet that when i arrived on an ifr flight plan i was vectored
straight in to the vor 27 approach and arriving was a nonissue and
avoided all the vfr traffic lineup(being "forced" to taxi in the grass
on the other hand was a bit disconcerting).  in the notam it says to
cancel ifr and go in vfr but on the 2 occasions that i flew in on an ifr
flight plan(the first time in a bellanca super viking) atc took me
straight in ifr.  perhaps for those that are able to file ifr this would
be worthwhile in our planes.  

fwiw,

david weinsweig
n750dw propjet


>>> GAMarr@Charter.Net 08/07/2008 3:09 PM >>>
It appears that the majority of accidents are a result of stall/spin
accidents with arriving traffic. Is it possible that the approach
procedures
are a little to tight for novice/low proficiency pilots in the very
intense
approach phase atmosphere?

 

I know the controllers are very anxious to keep the traffic tight to
facilitate the arrival flow. I know that I have been told to turn base
and
expedite my landing and clear the runway for arriving higher speed
traffic
(P-51).


All of our training is based on one runway, one airplane. This may be
the
first time many pilots are faced with one runway and 1, 2, or 3
airplanes
all landing at the same time. Truly, not part of our normal training. I
can
tell you from my own personnel experience that I am in a very high
state of
awareness at to what the other airplanes are doing and my concern that
someone will not execute the landing properly, so I am always primed
for a
go-around.

 

Giff Marr

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster