Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:10:04 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2977257@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=Mnf+c0tbTWWMSK5KugWSNPeV4MGX0dZqeXP3rgjxLpi4qv9OTHGkYJL094ofz+ZN;
  h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
From: "Jim Nordin" <panelmaker@earthlink.net>
Subject: Traffic Systems
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <list-2977132@logan.com>
Thread-Index: AcjTFjFOOsa6tubuQIeM4it2AtxfOQAAOoZQ

Might be wrong, but I think the regs say that if you have an operational
transponder you must have it on and operating while flying.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Colyn
Case at earthlink
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:42 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Traffic Systems
anyone want to write your friends at EAA and tell them it really is worth it

to require a transponder, and that it is on?