X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:42:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTP id 2975578 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:52:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=j7ESsVwJNdpSpHabskQQVvTqPZ3sjVXoEo13SX9IGN8GkA23sUg++22S3CarTKz/; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.35] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1K9S2e-00059C-AD for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:51:40 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <00cd01c8d256$aa97bab0$6501a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: Subject: accident stats X-Original-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:51:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C8D235.23300B70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9407b1556946e2fbb5cb9f0fe32ccb548cc350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.35 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C8D235.23300B70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable is anyone still keeping track of all the lancair accidents? I'm wondering if we track: a) is a member of lml b) had advanced = training ? I can think of a few cases where both (a) and (b) were true but I can = think of a lot more where at least (a) was not true. It seems like there is a positive correlation of pilots who both bought = their planes already built and didn't participate in lml for an extended = period, with accident stats. I'm wondering if it would do any good to = track down lancair used sales and extend an invitation to new owners. = ....and maybe also provide them with some synopsis of the group = learning. Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C8D235.23300B70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

is anyone still keeping track of all = the lancair=20 accidents?

I'm wondering if we track: a) is a = member of=20 lml b) had advanced training ?

I can think of a few cases where both = (a) and (b)=20 were true but I can think of a lot more where at least (a) was not=20 true.

It seems like there is a positive = correlation of=20 pilots who both bought their planes already built and didn't participate = in lml=20 for an extended period, with accident stats. I'm wondering = if it=20 would do any good to track down lancair used sales and extend an = invitation to=20 new owners. ....and maybe also provide them with some = synopsis=20 of the group learning.

Colyn

------=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C8D235.23300B70--