Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:51:51 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2733014@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.92; envelope-from=randystuart@hotmail.com
From: "Randy" <randystuart@hotmail.com>
References: <list-2731096@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Angle valve or parallel !
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is this Demon's plane from So Cal?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Iverin" <roger@iverin.com>
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:16 AM
Subject: [LML] Angle valve or parallel !


> Folks,
>
> Upcoming for my project is a engine rebuildt, currently it's an angle 
> valve with updraft... it's very bad.
> Just after easter I will rebuild engine to downdraft, however I'm not sure 
> about I should go for angle or parallel valve.
>
> I understand if I go for angle I need to bump out cowling, and ofcourse 
> heavier engine.
> But with 10:1 pistons or turbo this should be great power ?
>
> Could be nice to hear from others with angle how they perform and how 
> tight cowling issues was done ?
> All know how is welcome....
>
> I guess as well If I want to keep the turbo a parallel valve will give 
> better space for stuff ?
>
> Please comment and help me find the way to go !
>
> Best regards
> Roger Iverin
> www.n360df.com
>
> --
> For archives and unsub 
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>