X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:16:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [217.168.144.219] (HELO 1gir.no) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTPS id 2730004 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:24:23 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=217.168.144.219; envelope-from=roger@iverin.com Received: (qmail 29391 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2008 21:23:49 +0100 Received: from 10.213-167-105.customer.lyse.net (HELO ?192.168.2.103?) (213.167.105.10) by de003121.idaq.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2008 21:23:49 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <47B4A32F.80303@iverin.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:23:11 +0100 From: Roger Iverin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Angle valve or parallel ! References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Folks, Upcoming for my project is a engine rebuildt, currently it's an angle valve with updraft... it's very bad. Just after easter I will rebuild engine to downdraft, however I'm not sure about I should go for angle or parallel valve. I understand if I go for angle I need to bump out cowling, and ofcourse heavier engine. But with 10:1 pistons or turbo this should be great power ? Could be nice to hear from others with angle how they perform and how tight cowling issues was done ? All know how is welcome.... I guess as well If I want to keep the turbo a parallel valve will give better space for stuff ? Please comment and help me find the way to go ! Best regards Roger Iverin www.n360df.com