X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:08:44 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web36906.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.74] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with SMTP id 2728010 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:56:57 -0500 Received: (qmail 56171 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Feb 2008 14:56:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=4n7WD/JqjWLFWEPzGoLUCBHhNlzol0/2L0+utndJuqIOXZl3h3sVBxFrnAcAiseDAkoUmqMyx7JaIzh24UgkKQkoKooFGT2lhAE4tmNsvQbzIdn9vI5cmNFcwa2Unrbtt34EHqsQqE0MyJrfKMaXP7qu/i/IIPWkkK2f3rEC068=; X-YMail-OSG: QfPTTEEVM1n_8wrRVrIFLrQH34fnijAziW6sfRJ_WqvBM5kv_r8F827b.sB90c9KiJlCaH_15hhNtwB.t5RtItGX48g5dYrC4TfRBZORWRbmw64- Received: from [209.225.224.254] by web36906.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:56:46 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.162 X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:56:46 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Zavatson Subject: Re: [LML] 235/320/360 gear dump valve idea X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1014656544-1202914606=:32827" X-Original-Message-ID: <177894.32827.qm@web36906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-1014656544-1202914606=:32827 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Larry,=0AI imagine the non-O-ring version would slide freely back to center= .=0AIt's just a theory, but is consistent with reported behavior. It would= require disassembly of the affected pumps to verify.=0AChris=0A=0A=0A-----= Original Message ----=0AFrom: LHenney =0ATo: lml@lanc= aironline.net=0ASent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:18:12 PM=0ASubject: [LML= ] 235/320/360 gear dump valve idea=0A=0A=0AChris,=0A =0AMine has the O ring= . However, the O ring is a 013 where the outer two O rings (in the same tu= be) that hold the poppet cups are 014. They all feel =93tight=94 to me bu= t obviously the spool valve O ring is made to move and not only seal. I gu= ess your premise hear is that the O ringed spool valve would do better than= the other?=0A =0ALarry=0A=0A=0A _____________________________________= _______________________________________________=0ALooking for last minute s= hopping deals? =0AFind them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.= yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=3Dshopping --0-1014656544-1202914606=:32827 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Larry,
=0A
I imagine the non-O-ring= version would slide freely back to center.
=0A
It's just a t= heory, but is consistent with reported behavior.  It would requir= e disassembly of the affected pumps to verify.
=0A
Chris
<= BR>
=0A
----- Original Message ----
From: LHenney <LHen= ney@charter.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tuesday, February= 12, 2008 9:18:12 PM
Subject: [LML] 235/320/360 gear dump valve idea
=
=0A=0A=0A
=0A

Chris,=

=0A

 

=0A

Mine = has the O ring.  However, the O ring is a 013 where the outer two O ri= ngs (in the same tube)  that hold the poppet cups are 014.  They = all feel =93tight=94 to me but obviously the spool valve O ring is made to = move and not only seal.  I guess your premise hear is that the O ringe= d spool valve would do better than the other?

=0A

 

=0A

Larry

=0A<= P class=3DMsoNormal> 

=

=0A=0A
Never miss a thing. Make Ya= hoo your homepage.=0A=0A --0-1014656544-1202914606=:32827--