X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:23:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc3-s21.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.221] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2650488 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:56:53 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.221; envelope-from=randystuart@hotmail.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.139.13]) by bay0-omc3-s21.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:56:15 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:56:15 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 68.183.63.181 by BAY134-DAV3.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:56:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.183.63.181] X-Originating-Email: [randystuart@hotmail.com] X-Sender: randystuart@hotmail.com From: "Randy" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Catto Props X-Original-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:56:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D3_01C8594B.67CBFC20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2008 04:56:15.0333 (UTC) FILETIME=[74691150:01C8598E] X-Original-Return-Path: randystuart@hotmail.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D3_01C8594B.67CBFC20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I flew with a guy that had a Catto 3 blade prop. He had two of them, one = older and one new. He wound up putting on a governor and a Hartzell = constant speed prop. The acceleration was poor and running the engine = above 3,000 RPM's is real hard on the fuel, not to mention the noise and = vibration. The top speed wasn't bad but not as fast as the rest us ours. = But..... The prop was real smooth an light. It's a 360.=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: sbej=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:41 PM Subject: [LML] Catto Props Not looking for opinions. Im looking for anyone with real data on = performance with a Catto 3 blade fixed pitch prop on a Lancair 320 or = 360. =20 Thank You Bryan ------=_NextPart_000_00D3_01C8594B.67CBFC20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I flew with a guy = that had a=20 Catto 3 blade prop. He had two of them, one older and one new. He wound = up=20 putting on a governor and a Hartzell constant speed prop. The = acceleration was=20 poor and running the engine above 3,000 RPM's is real hard on the fuel, = not to=20 mention the noise and vibration. The top speed wasn't bad but not as = fast as the=20 rest us ours. But..... The prop was real smooth an light. It's a 360.=20
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 sbej =
Sent: Thursday, January 17, = 2008 8:41=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Catto = Props

Not looking for opinions.  Im = looking for=20 anyone with real data on performance with a Catto 3 blade fixed pitch = prop on=20 a Lancair 320 or 360.   
 
Thank You
Bryan
------=_NextPart_000_00D3_01C8594B.67CBFC20--