X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:46:59 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net ([68.230.240.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2643213 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:55:03 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.9; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080113135422.QGWM24467.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:54:22 -0500 Received: from bh1 ([72.209.225.157]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id cdtJ1Y00J3QP3uo0000000; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:53:19 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <001201c855eb$d1b7ac50$6401a8c0@bh1> From: "Bill & Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: MKII tail vs original tail?? X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:54:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C855C1.E8A3B0F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C855C1.E8A3B0F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dom, sorry, I don't recall any "ropeyness" in your flying at all. Seemed = just fine to me. I dunno, I just can't seem to discover any problem with = my small tail after 1,400 hours in all kinds of conditions. I rather = like it this way. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1,450 hrs N6ZQ IV under construction The only Lancair's I have handled in the air were all large tail = versions, with one exception, that being N5ZQ in the States. Bill will = undoubtedly recall that I was - let's say "ropey" - to say the least. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C855C1.E8A3B0F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dom, sorry, I don't recall any = "ropeyness"=20 in your flying at all. Seemed just fine to me. I dunno, I just can't = seem to=20 discover any problem with my small tail after 1,400 hours in all kinds = of=20 conditions. I rather like it this way.

Bill = Harrelson

N5ZQ 320 1,450 = hrs

N6ZQ IV under=20 construction

The only Lancair=92s I have = handled in the air=20 were all large tail versions, with one exception, that being N5ZQ in the = States.=20 Bill will undoubtedly recall that I was =96 let=92s say =93ropey=94 =96 = to say the least.=20

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C855C1.E8A3B0F0--