Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #45520
From: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Reliability Question
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:03:11 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 12/27/2007 8:47:09 P.M. Central Standard Time, rwolf99@aol.com writes:
By the way, I personally don't believe the failure probability numbers that the systems safety engineers come up with.  I believe that the actual rate of failure is significantly higher. 
 
Rob,
 
You are correct. The actual rate can be higher. In actuality the numbers 1 x 10 (-9) is probably for Part 25 aircraft (airliners) and not GA (Part 23) where the allowed failure rate I believe is lower.
However, I *do* believe that using this methodology has given us a fleet of aircraft whose reliability we are comfortable with.
Comfort is a "state of mind"- not connected necessarily to reality.
 
Jeff



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster