X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:42:42 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2581489@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <mattreeves@yahoo.com>
Received: from web60011.mail.yahoo.com ([209.73.178.74] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1)
  with SMTP id 2580066 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:06:29 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.73.178.74; envelope-from=mattreeves@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 510 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Dec 2007 21:05:39 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=QCtPdLwQkz0gNIMT9KYdipFrUYQ+KvlbFqSE7x+EHJSe/NWMiFjuEbILaeyYgoQtGF05DQXlk01eY8PTCtsyfFSthZaaEjpxrqCf9Djhzydo74lEVltfO9cxlsY8T4/qhz7+7mmvvVTKMNSr3Okhp6s+EDE5T5jzTglVq0WbicI=;
X-YMail-OSG: AY73ybcVM1lbGdbignpnNvBqjK70AWpBFUTqdKH2MrKXYom8hUg0TmsohBlFL5pc7tqqOhbeX9I0ociXmVi2PaqqaSPXCr5vMjexLPlrhY7j47L2nwyq
Received: from [74.34.211.8] by web60011.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:05:39 PST
X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:05:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Reeves <mattreeves@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] FW: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-2579488@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-632876204-1197579939=:97980"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <200481.97980.qm@web60011.mail.yahoo.com>

--0-632876204-1197579939=:97980
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Garry,
   
  I hate to suggest it, but you could make a longer push rod.
   
  Matt

LHenney <LHenney@charter.net> wrote:
  Garry,

Yes, in this case, more is fine. I believe that quote came because there
was a guy who had his bob weight in upside down (appearing right side up,
btw). He was unable to get enough forward stick authority to exit his stall
testing and went crunch.

IMHO, the 1/4" is affectively a "no interference" requirement.

Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Laznicka, Garry [MCCUS] [mailto:GLaznic@MCCUS.JNJ.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:05 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING

Looking at the page 15-28 Rev 6/04-01-99 in "Lancair 320FB manual" where
Figure-9a is depicted, it's specified there that with full elevator down (11
degrees) the Elevator Idler arm (which supports the Bob weight) to be 1/4"
from Rear push/pull tube. My question is:

Would that be acceptable to have this distance at 0.59"
Or is it absolutely critical that I have it at 0.25"

I am maxed out on push-rods travel at this point.

Thank you in advance for your suggestions and advice.
Regards,
Garry V. Laznicka
L-360c 85%



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


       
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
--0-632876204-1197579939=:97980
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div>Garry,</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>I hate to suggest it, but you could make a longer push rod.</div>  <div>&nbsp;</div>  <div>Matt<BR><BR><B><I>LHenney &lt;LHenney@charter.net&gt;</I></B> wrote:</div>  <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Garry,<BR><BR>Yes, in this case, more is fine. I believe that quote came because there<BR>was a guy who had his bob weight in upside down (appearing right side up,<BR>btw). He was unable to get enough forward stick authority to exit his stall<BR>testing and went crunch.<BR><BR>IMHO, the 1/4" is affectively a "no interference" requirement.<BR><BR>Larry<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Laznicka, Garry [MCCUS] [mailto:GLaznic@MCCUS.JNJ.com] <BR>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:05 AM<BR>To: lml@lancaironline.net<BR>Subject: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING<BR><BR>Looking at the page 15-28 Rev 6/04-01-99 in "Lancair 320FB manual" where<BR>Figure-9a is depicted, it's
 specified there that with full elevator down (11<BR>degrees) the Elevator Idler arm (which supports the Bob weight) to be 1/4"<BR>from Rear push/pull tube. My question is:<BR><BR>Would that be acceptable to have this distance at 0.59"<BR>Or is it absolutely critical that I have it at 0.25"<BR><BR>I am maxed out on push-rods travel at this point.<BR><BR>Thank you in advance for your suggestions and advice.<BR>Regards,<BR>Garry V. Laznicka<BR>L-360c 85%<BR><BR><BR><BR>--<BR>For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p>&#32;

      <hr size=1>Never miss a thing.  <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs"> Make Yahoo your homepage.</a>


--0-632876204-1197579939=:97980--