X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:03:45 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.62] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2465275 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:40:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=khWb4/ccw0nhaAwX6k/EFGAeELVpeWYSXCyoXkDhV2jNwFUevwC9+E6fNVbafQby; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [76.30.49.213] (helo=DELL8300) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1IqvF4-0001X5-EV for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:39:38 -0500 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Permanant Header Tank X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:41:37 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01C82397.08F22560" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AcgjucMldxX6DqRwQ3ubJEOuExcxRgAD2TKg In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-ID: X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c26098543474d4637c205d8fe780b1fc30904350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 76.30.49.213 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C82397.08F22560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit One of the best I can think of is access to the aft side of the firewall and brake cylinders et al. Jim _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Wullner Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:50 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Permanant Header Tank Anyone have good reasoning as to why I shouldn't permanantly bond my header tank on? I tried the hinge method and the fit with the cowling was terrible so I had to take the entire thing apart today. Now Im thinking it may be a whole lot easier to install and finish by bonding the tank on for good. My brake systems are all easily accesible even with it on. I cant think of any reason I would ever remove it after the thing is flying. Anybody have a good argument against this? Thanks. ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C82397.08F22560 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

One of the best I can think of is = access to the aft side of the firewall and brake cylinders et = al.

Jim

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Wullner
Sent: Saturday, November = 10, 2007 10:50 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Permanant = Header Tank

Anyone have good reasoning as to why I shouldn't = permanantly bond my header tank on? I tried the hinge method and the fit with = the cowling was terrible so I had to take the entire thing apart today. Now = Im thinking it may be a whole lot easier to install and finish by bonding = the tank on for good. My brake systems are all easily = accesible even with it on. I cant think of any reason I would ever remove it after the = thing is flying. Anybody have a good argument against this?

Thanks.

------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C82397.08F22560--