X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:49:48 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2464334 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:21:36 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.252.48; envelope-from=sbej@verizon.net Received: from your4105e587b6 ([75.82.233.22]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JR900F0YQIPB2H6@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:20:50 -0600 (CST) X-Original-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:21:02 -0800 From: "Bryan Wullner" Subject: Permanant Header Tank X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Message-id: <001201c82340$578e93e0$6500a8c0@your4105e587b6> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C822FD.48D52E60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C822FD.48D52E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anyone have good reasoning as to why I shouldn't permanantly bond my = header tank on? I tried the hinge method and the fit with the cowling = was terrible so I had to take the entire thing apart today. Now Im = thinking it may be a whole lot easier to install and finish by bonding = the tank on for good. My brake systems are all easily accesible even = with it on. I cant think of any reason I would ever remove it after the = thing is flying. Anybody have a good argument against this? Thanks. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C822FD.48D52E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Anyone have good reasoning as to why I = shouldn't=20 permanantly bond my header tank on? I tried the hinge method and = the fit=20 with the cowling was terrible so I had to take the entire thing apart = today. Now=20 Im thinking it may be a whole lot easier to install and finish by = bonding the=20 tank on for good. My brake systems are all easily = accesible even=20 with it on. I cant think of any reason I would ever remove it after the = thing is=20 flying. Anybody have a good argument against this?

Thanks.

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C822FD.48D52E60--