Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) with ESMTP id 1024357 for rob@logan.com; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 00:09:41 -0500 Received: from imo-r07.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.103]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:41:21 -0500 Received: from Epijk@aol.com by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id k.105.f652605 (3942) for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:42:39 -0500 (EST) From: Epijk@aol.com Message-ID: <105.f652605.29726a3f@aol.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:42:39 EST Subject: Propeller efficiency To: lancair.list@olsusa.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 1/12/2002 2:27:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, glcasey@gte.net writes: <<<...The equation for "np" above certainly sounds like efficiency to me...>>> Gary: It IS efficiency, as pointed out quite eloquently by Brent Regan on 1/08. Subsequently, I posted an explanation of why it is perfectly valid to refer to it as a percentage instead of a decimal fraction, but Eric, being wound up with "hard physics", can't seem to grasp the 5th grade concept of percentage expressions. He must be bored; that's the only reason I can figure for the continued drivel. Jack Kane >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>