Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #42908
From: Matt Hapgood <matt.hapgood@alumni.duke.edu>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: FW: [LML] Re: ADAHRS TSO
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:20:02 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Close.  I think it is 4:

 

One side of beam/other side of beam/leftover

13/13/1

6/6/1

3/3

1/1/1

 

 

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv@lancair.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 6:53 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: FW: [LML] Re: ADAHRS TSO

 

Posted for "John Barrett" <2thman@cablespeed.com>:

Let me try that again. If you are lucky just weigh one. If it’s the heavy
one, then you’ve done it in one measurement – that’s the answer to the
question.

Assuming you are unlucky and need to find the quickest path of eliminating
the 623 gram cylinders, Then I think the number of steps is five. It is
conditional, but either path requires five measurements to get to one
remaining piston. You would pick groups of cylinders to weigh in one of the
following two sequences:

1. 13,6,3,2,1
2. 13,7,4,2,1

Obviously, you would select each group by halving or halving minus one
piston (even or odd group?) from each succeeding “heavy”. Just divide the
weight of each sample by 623. If there is one gram left over, then the next
halving should be taken randomly fr om that group. Otherwise, grab from the
pistons you randomly did not select to do the most current weighing.

--
 
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster