X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:03:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [68.98.211.24] (HELO systems3.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2146988 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:52:32 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.98.211.24; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7BA09.3650CF7C" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: [LML] To de-ice, or not to de-ice, and if so, how? X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:51:51 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <87C33F695961494D886EB3B6C8A476512F3CDE@s3server.Systems3.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] To de-ice, or not to de-ice, and if so, how? Thread-Index: Ace52yFo4hWsCjJvQMCrZFVA0tQlrwALTUVw From: "Craig Berland" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7BA09.3650CF7C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Hafen , I put boots on the prop and nothing else. Why? If descending through unforeseen ice, I feel it is a big step in the right direction. The effort was quite high as I have an air-conditioning compressor up there with the slip ring. Craig Berland =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7BA09.3650CF7C Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

John Hafen , I put = boots on=20 the prop and nothing else. Why? If descending through=20 unforeseen ice, I feel it is a big step in the right direction. = The effort=20 was quite high as I have an air-conditioning compressor up there with = the slip=20 ring.

Craig=20 Berland

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7BA09.3650CF7C--