X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (51%) URL: contains host with port number (-49%) URL: weird port adjustment Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 12:28:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com ([64.136.20.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with SMTP id 2039930 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 May 2007 12:18:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.20.164; envelope-from=glong2@netzero.net Received: from your4dacd0ea75 (dialup-4.228.72.164.Dial1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.228.72.164]) by smtp03.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABDEM4F3AHN9Q62 for (sender ); Sat, 12 May 2007 09:18:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "glong2" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: IO-550 fuel injection X-Original-Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:17:54 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c794b1$192beda0$a448e404@your4dacd0ea75> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AceTNwkw+DwjcD2mRgue8sJ0KU0IVQBcMpsg In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-ContentStamp: 32:16:686361778 X-MAIL-INFO:0ba544904410ad951090e0e99020a0e530711579c100d9b5a17925804dd5d50d058160c9a5f5e92d29a520e0e099e9adad61c179a5e4a0a0b55991f1e0e5f0755050a9f9518d382d6194 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: QLtLkOW1eqYBwH/v5e7EP9xEKM8S+WYQMv9b+r+7d84oZnJ8+O2Blw== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.140.24.123|smtp03.nyc.untd.com|smtp03.nyc.untd.com|glong2@netzero.net Rick, Mike I have looked at all common components and cannot find an air leak or loose fitting anywhere. If it is intermittent I don't know how to troubleshoot, but it has not happened again! My son came up with a possibility that has a high probability of causing the problem. The only hang-up is that it happened on both vent lines; that seems to lower the probability. Here is the theory. The 1/4" tube from the NACA scoop takes a 180 degree 1" uphill bend. The flex tube from the NACA scoop to the tank vent line then goes uphill another 1" to the fuel tank vent line. The 1/4" vent line goes downhill to the tank by the camber of the wing. The PROBLEM: a 1" uphill metal tube, a 1/2" downhill flex tube then 1.5" uphill to the tank vent line. Think of a "P" trap under your sink. I took the wing tips off and sure enough that is exactly what I had. Because I built everything symmetrical, both wing vents were the same. Not only that, there was clear evidence that there had been something in the P trap at some time because the flex tubing was discolored in the low spot. It was very evident in the right wing and not so evident in the left wing. I naturally fixed the problem by replacing the tubing with a length 1" longer than 1/2 of the old length. How did water get into the P trap? As I said, it is the only time I squeeged the wings parallel to the cord. There was enough moisture that it was running down the wings in places. (I need to do the experiment of drizzling water down the edge of the wingtip to see if it collects in the NACA scoop.) If there was water in the scoop, then it could have been sucked into the trap from start-up prop wash, taxing, or on takeoff. Why both tanks? My standard starting procedure is to prime and start on the left tank and run on it until the Chelton system boots up. Then I switch to the right tank for taxi, run-up and takeoff. No boost pump until takeoff. Soooo-- It is possible for both the left and right traps to get water in them from prop wash or taxi and maybe at takeoff. The boost pump would suck hard enough to overcome the small amount of water in the trap, but it did not suck it into the tank. Since there was a small vacuum in the tank, when I shut off the boost pump the fuel flow and pressure would immediately go to zero and the engine quit. This assumes that the mechanical fuel pump could not overcome about 1/2" to 1" water pressure. Before I landed the water had evaporated and on the ground and ever since I could not/cannot repeat the problem. The best reasonable explanation I have come up with! Yes, I was running LOP as I always do. I have more time than money. I usually run 12.5 with no wind and 13 to 13.5 against the wind. I tested the vent lines and neither had a restriction except for the 1/4" diameter. No I have not drained the gas filter because I hoped to repeat the problem. Now that I have a "high probability" solution I will sump the filter. Eugene Long Lancair Super ES glong2@netzero.net -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of rtitsworth Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:12 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: IO-550 fuel injection Eugene, More (silly) thoughts... At first it seemed as if the symptoms could be related to a partially plugged vent line (bugs, dirt, etc), which was perhaps aggravated by some moisture. However, it seems unlikely that both lines would be plugged and that the results would be so binary at the same time. Thus, I'd first focus on the common components. To test the vent line, open the filler cap and suck on the vent line (naca end). DON'T BLOW ON THE VENT LINE, AS ANY FOD MAY BE FORCED INTO THE TANK. Also naturally, caution against inhaling any fuel and/or vapor. What about an intermittent suction leak between the boost pump and the mech fuel pump? The mech pump would then just draw air (versus fuel). You would think that a loose fitting (etc) would also leak fuel - but I've seen poor fittings that would suck air and yet not drip/spray liquid. The mech fuel pump has a case seal (and associated drain). If the case seal fails, does/can the pump draw air??? If you run the boost pump with the engine off and the mech pump case seal has failed, will fuel typically run/drip out the drain? (that's my assumption as a test). Do your injector drains and fuel pump case drain all run together (making individual ID difficult)? Still unknown as to why it (seemingly) fixed itself and/or whether the humidity had any relevance. At 12.5 GHP it sounds like you were LOP (guess). Were you at similar power settings on the later return trip when things were fine? Rick -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html