|
|
Thanks for the various feedback. I'll certainly give Aerox a look as
well as Mountain Air/High/Low, whatever. Perhaps I need soma "O" at sea
level to think clearly.
Chuck Jensen
-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
mmcmanus@grandecom.net
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:14 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Mountain Air Oxygen
I'll second the endorsement for Aerox. I have occassionally gone up to
13 or 14k and the Aerox works great. They have always been very helpful
in answering my dumb questions. And when I was comparing prices they
came out on top. I don't have a need for high dollar, sophisticated
systems (not that theirs is not sophisticated), but for what I do the
Aerox is the best value. Matt McManus LNC2 360
Quoting John Schroeder <jschroeder@perigee.net>:
> Why don't you look into Aerox's systems. They are great people to deal
> with and reasonable. We have one of their 4 place systems with a big
> bottle installed in our ES and like it a lot. If you want the
> conservartion aspect, look into Precise Flight. Lloyd at Aerox might
> be able to work with you to meld the two systems.
>
> Aerox: http://www.aerox.com/
>
> Precise Flight: http://www.preciseflight.com/viewpage.php?pID=25
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 18:17:06 -0400, Alan Adamson <aadamson@highrf.com>
> wrote:
>
> > IMHO, there is simply no better than the "pulse demand" system that
> Mountain
> > High makes. I have it in portable because the built in is just soo
> > darn expensive. However, they recently came out with a 2 port pulse
> > controller that can sorta be "mounted". I less expensive way to go
> > for a great system without all the costs.
> >
> > BTW, I have a *small* by most peoples standard bottle and with the
> > pulse setup, it lasts easily 30+ hrs at 12000'...
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf
> > Of
> Chuck
> > Jensen
> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:17 PM
> > To: lml@lancaironline.net
> > Subject: [LML] Mountain Air Oxygen
> >
> > I'm in the market for an oxygen system and wondered if there were
> > specific recommendations better than the Mountain Air system with
> > conserving nebs. Since a lot of LNCs are high flyers, I figured this
> > would be an obvious information source. If anybody has a bottle
> > system they are replacing with an installed system, I'd be
> > interested in the portable equipment.
> >
> > Chuck Jensen
> >
> > --
> > For archives and unsub
> > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > For archives and unsub
> > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>
>
--
For archives and unsub
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
|
|