Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:43:44 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2038012@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.13.226.109; envelope-from=cjensen@dts9000.com
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Mountain Air Oxygen
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Mountain Air Oxygen
Thread-Index: AceTen9rBEHxTel2QimiSzBHJddfwAAS57BQ
From: "Chuck Jensen" <cjensen@dts9000.com>

Thanks for the various feedback.  I'll certainly give Aerox a look as
well as Mountain Air/High/Low, whatever.  Perhaps I need soma "O" at sea
level to think clearly.

Chuck Jensen


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
mmcmanus@grandecom.net
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:14 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Mountain Air Oxygen


I'll second the endorsement for Aerox. I have occassionally gone up to
13 or 14k and the Aerox works great.  They have always been very helpful
in answering my dumb questions.  And when I was comparing prices they
came out on top. I don't have a need for high dollar, sophisticated
systems (not that theirs is not sophisticated), but for what I do the
Aerox is the best value. Matt McManus LNC2 360

Quoting John Schroeder <jschroeder@perigee.net>:

> Why don't you look into Aerox's systems. They are great people to deal

> with and reasonable. We have one of their 4 place systems with a big=20
> bottle installed in our ES and like it a lot. If you want the=20
> conservartion aspect, look into Precise Flight. Lloyd at Aerox might=20
> be able to work with you to meld the two systems.
>
> Aerox: http://www.aerox.com/
>
> Precise Flight: http://www.preciseflight.com/viewpage.php?pID=3D25
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 18:17:06 -0400, Alan Adamson <aadamson@highrf.com>

> wrote:
>
> > IMHO, there is simply no better than the "pulse demand" system that
> Mountain
> > High makes.  I have it in portable because the built in is just soo=20
> > darn expensive.  However, they recently came out with a 2 port pulse

> > controller that can sorta be "mounted".  I less expensive way to go=20
> > for a great system without all the costs.
> >
> > BTW, I have a *small* by most peoples standard bottle and with the=20
> > pulse setup, it lasts easily 30+ hrs at 12000'...
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf=20
> > Of
> Chuck
> > Jensen
> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:17 PM
> > To: lml@lancaironline.net
> > Subject: [LML] Mountain Air Oxygen
> >
> > I'm in the market for an oxygen system and wondered if there were=20
> > specific recommendations better than the Mountain Air system with=20
> > conserving nebs. Since a lot of LNCs are high flyers, I figured this

> > would be an obvious information source.  If anybody has a bottle=20
> > system they are replacing with an installed system, I'd be=20
> > interested in the portable equipment.
> >
> > Chuck Jensen
> >
> > --
> > For archives and unsub=20
> > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > For archives and unsub=20
> > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub=20
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>
>


--
For archives and unsub
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html