Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:14:05 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2037157@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.90.130.73; envelope-from=mmcmanus@grandecom.net
From: mmcmanus@grandecom.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Mountain Air Oxygen
References: <list-2037046@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2037046@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3

I'll second the endorsement for Aerox. I have occassionally gone up to 13 or 14k
and the Aerox works great.  They have always been very helpful in answering my
dumb questions.  And when I was comparing prices they came out on top. I don't
have a need for high dollar, sophisticated systems (not that theirs is not
sophisticated), but for what I do the Aerox is the best value.
Matt McManus
LNC2 360

Quoting John Schroeder <jschroeder@perigee.net>:

> Why don't you look into Aerox's systems. They are great people to deal with
> and reasonable. We have one of their 4 place systems with a big bottle
> installed in our ES and like it a lot. If you want the conservartion aspect,
> look into Precise Flight. Lloyd at Aerox might be able to work with you to
> meld the two systems.
>
> Aerox: http://www.aerox.com/
>
> Precise Flight: http://www.preciseflight.com/viewpage.php?pID=25
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 18:17:06 -0400, Alan Adamson <aadamson@highrf.com> wrote:
>
> > IMHO, there is simply no better than the "pulse demand" system that
> Mountain
> > High makes.  I have it in portable because the built in is just soo darn
> > expensive.  However, they recently came out with a 2 port pulse controller
> > that can sorta be "mounted".  I less expensive way to go for a great system
> > without all the costs.
> >
> > BTW, I have a *small* by most peoples standard bottle and with the pulse
> > setup, it lasts easily 30+ hrs at 12000'...
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
> Chuck
> > Jensen
> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:17 PM
> > To: lml@lancaironline.net
> > Subject: [LML] Mountain Air Oxygen
> >
> > I'm in the market for an oxygen system and wondered if there were specific
> > recommendations better than the Mountain Air system with conserving nebs.
> > Since a lot of LNCs are high flyers, I figured this would be an obvious
> > information source.  If anybody has a bottle system they are replacing with
> > an installed system, I'd be interested in the portable equipment.
> >
> > Chuck Jensen
> >
> > --
> > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>
>