X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (67%) URL: contains host with port number (33%) BODY: contains stock spam words Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:46:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [206.229.254.14] (HELO smtp.perigee.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2037036 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 May 2007 21:35:32 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.229.254.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study-2 (dsl-208-26-41-163.perigee.net [208.26.41.163]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l4B1YsKd008397 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 21:34:55 -0400 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Mountain Air Oxygen References: X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:34:42 -0400 From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.54 (Win32, build 7730) Why don't you look into Aerox's systems. They are great people to deal with and reasonable. We have one of their 4 place systems with a big bottle installed in our ES and like it a lot. If you want the conservartion aspect, look into Precise Flight. Lloyd at Aerox might be able to work with you to meld the two systems. Aerox: http://www.aerox.com/ Precise Flight: http://www.preciseflight.com/viewpage.php?pID=25 Cheers, John On Thu, 10 May 2007 18:17:06 -0400, Alan Adamson wrote: > IMHO, there is simply no better than the "pulse demand" system that Mountain > High makes. I have it in portable because the built in is just soo darn > expensive. However, they recently came out with a 2 port pulse controller > that can sorta be "mounted". I less expensive way to go for a great system > without all the costs. > > BTW, I have a *small* by most peoples standard bottle and with the pulse > setup, it lasts easily 30+ hrs at 12000'... > > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Chuck > Jensen > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:17 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Mountain Air Oxygen > > I'm in the market for an oxygen system and wondered if there were specific > recommendations better than the Mountain Air system with conserving nebs. > Since a lot of LNCs are high flyers, I figured this would be an obvious > information source. If anybody has a bottle system they are replacing with > an installed system, I'd be interested in the portable equipment. > > Chuck Jensen > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > >