X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:13:33 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1839489 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:08:59 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.cde.9ab2174 (14457) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:08:03 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:08:03 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: DH Lines- Nylaflow Failures X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1171548483" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5354 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1171548483 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It sounds like the vast majority of Nylaflow failures are down by the wheels. In my ES, I have Nylaflow just to connect the pedals. I've also heard that Nylaflow is susceptible to UV damage, not an issue where my tubing is either. Is the tubing connecting the pedals a common point of failure or not? Mike Easley -------------------------------1171548483 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It sounds like the vast majority of Nylaflow failures are down by the=20 wheels. In my ES, I have Nylaflow just to connect the pedals. I'= ve=20 also heard that Nylaflow is susceptible to UV damage, not an issue where my=20 tubing is either. Is the tubing connecting the pedals a common point o= f=20 failure or not?

Mike Easley

-------------------------------1171548483--