X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:28:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1838327 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:09:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.4; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c07.f036e4e (40521) for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:08:21 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:08:21 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Night vision goggles X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1171494501" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5358 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1171494501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/14/2007 4:25:57 P.M. Central Standard Time, sreeves@sc.rr.com writes: So I could use an O2 tank minus the regulator for propulsion to my destination? Would that meet the requirements for airworthiness? Steve O2 is cheaper. Steve, You seem giddy, perhaps you might consider using some O2 now....... Grayhawk -------------------------------1171494501 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 2/14/2007 4:25:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 sreeves@sc.rr.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>So I=20 could use an O2 tank minus the regulator for propulsion to my=20 destination? Would that meet the requirements for=20 airworthiness?

Steve

O2 is=20 cheaper.

Steve,

You seem giddy, perhaps you might consider using some O2 now.......

Grayhawk

-------------------------------1171494501--