Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #38687
From: Paul Lipps <elippse@sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Convex, concave, deadband
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:44:05 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
    Oh! God!, I did write convex when I meant to say concave! Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! And yes. if the surface preceding is 10cm thick, you would add 1.5cm to each side of the control LE, then follow that 13cm-thick rounded shape with a CONCAVITY down to the surface on each side. I should also have included the third thing this control treatment does; it reduces or eliminates dead-band! How's that for a for a reasonably simple mod, especially during manufacture! Drag reduction, flutter reduction, dead-band reduction. That's right up there with Rogaine and Viagra! And don't ask me why no kit or plane maker does that. Look at conventional prop planforms, then look at the planforms of the high-efficiency props I designed that give the Reno biplanes so much more speed. Why aren't the prop makers jumping all over that? Why aren't all of the other racers jumping on that? Fortunately, some are! At least two in F1 and at least one CS in Sport, and possibly a second!
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster