Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:38:36 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1599410@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.201; envelope-from=lcfitt@sbcglobal.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;
  b=gAkiWq43RDc6DHOvq848i3TGeqlAnfkYGibgVcrLxnXkTMppx52wM3yOvPLJkKsqLKD8mX2kQUiAfDgPiZLT4dDctBJb1hLjY4xAlBxmD/QUh4973/+G9d3dTQbj2osYQ9q9wJQdYzJSWcygnK8tEuOryih8+Lmak20yn7wqdi8=  ;
From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
References: <list-1598437@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Control Surface Shape
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Read Barnaby Wainfan in the December Kitplanes - Article on just this 
subject.

Lowell

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: <lml@flpi098.sbcis.sbc.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 10:40 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Control Surface Shape


>
>
> Posted for "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>:
>
>  In the regard to thickness of the trailing edge, I have been told that
>  aerobatics use a thicker TE to reduce stick force.  Can anyone direct me
>  as how to design or where to study what the TE should be to be optimum
>  for our aircraft.  On the Air Transport aircraft that I work on they are
>  composite in construction and usually between 0.25 to 0.375" in
>  thickness.
>  This is a subject that I have always found interesting.
>  John Cox
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/