X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.51.79.189] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.2) with HTTP id 1598425 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:40:01 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Nav Antenna To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.2 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:40:01 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1164325089.456630e1ac1d0@webmail.grandecom.net> References: <1164325089.456630e1ac1d0@webmail.grandecom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for mmcmanus@grandecom.net: Paul, you wrote, "A tip-off that destructive interference is taking place is that the reception changes with frequency, some channels being better than others." I seem to have much better (long distance com) reception with frequencies at the bottom like 118.xx to say 126.xx than the higher frequencies. It's a safe bet that if I get handed off to a center controller at say 132.xx they will be able to hear me, but I won't be able to hear them. Is this what you are referring to above that may be caused by "destructive interference"? Matt McManus Lnc2 360