X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:38:30 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m17.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1589080 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:10:37 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.207; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.cb2.427c865 (41812) for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:09:43 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:09:43 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 4P Nose Gear. X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1164114583" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5326 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1164114583 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert, Don't you also have the new style strut with stronger damping force? But you are right, we really don't have enough data to definitively determine the cause of the shimmy. Some people seem to get it, some don't. But the ES seems to suffer more shimmy than the retractables. This is the first I'd heard of any in the Legacy. Mike -------------------------------1164114583 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Robert,

Don't you also have the new style strut with stronger damping force?&nb= sp;=20 But you are right, we really don't have enough data to definitively determin= e=20 the cause of the shimmy. Some people seem to get it, some don't. = But=20 the ES seems to suffer more shimmy than the retractables.

This is the first I'd heard of any in the Legacy.

Mike

-------------------------------1164114583--