X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:41:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: ##### X-Orig-Return-Path: joeb@lancair.com X-PolluStop-Score: 0.50 X-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop v2.3.4 X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailfilter4.uci.net ([216.104.72.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with SMTP id 1551454 for marvkaye@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:47:02 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.104.72.83; envelope-from=joeb@lancair.com Received: (qmail 13084 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2006 13:46:18 -0000 Received: from ip-63-135-211-35.uci.net (HELO lancair.com) (63.135.211.35) by mailfilter4.uci.net with SMTP; 10 Nov 2006 13:46:18 -0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C704CD.014FB55A" Subject: FW: turbines X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:34:27 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <56F61FFD4498E64DB11C90D0C2B618FF421C65@lindbergh.lancair.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: turbines Thread-Index: AccEzNNqI+0TFoQXQNyTtKH01eFZXAAAB3+B References: <56F61FFD4498E64DB11C90D0C2B618FF421C64@lindbergh.lancair.local> From: "Joe Bartels" X-Original-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C704CD.014FB55A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 =20 Joseph C. Bartels, CEO Lancair International, Inc. ________________________________ From: Joe Bartels Sent: Fri 11/10/2006 5:33 AM Subject: turbines Marv: =20 Please post the following: =20 Listers: =20 Lancair turbine crashes are as varied as the pilots involved in those = crashes. I am extremely upset by each and every one of those incidents. = We send representatives to virtually all of the crash sites and assist = the FAA and NTSB in the investigations. It is never easy to be part of = that process, but, it does help us all to better understand what = happened so that we can all further learn from the facts of that = incident. =20 Years ago I began the process of working with the insurance industry to = put forth certain standards that would reduce the number of accidents = involving our aircraft. Those standards include 1) building the = aircraft at Lancair OR following its completion, having it inspected, = for insurance purposes, by one of our Lancair approved inspectors; 2) = that the systems remain stock, that is, that there are no modifications = to the airframe which are not pre-approved by our engineering staff; 3) = that the owner/operator receive training through our Lancair sponsored = flight training program (HPATS). That program includes a) initial = training; b) recurrency training 6 months thereafter; c) recurrency = training 6 months thereafter; and, d) annually thereafter. This was = not a singular system thought of by myself or anyone at Lancair for the = purpose of limiting the experimental enjoyment of the airframe. It was = so that AIG Insurance would provide coverage to a series of aircraft = that, to that point, had not and would not have received airframe = coverage. =20 While training does not guarantee safe operation of an aircraft, it = greatly improves the chances that the pilot will fly as he has been = trained, and in the face of an emergency will survive. =20 =20 What happened in Georgia? =20 =20 Simply put, there was a fuel starvation problem that should have = resulted in a safe landing when following standard training taught by = HPAT. =20 =20 What caused the fuel starvation problem? =20 This aircraft had a non-standard fuel system which incorporated two fuel = control valves and a rear mounted auxiliary tank. =20 Was this system approved by Lancair? =20 No it was not. =20 Did the pilot receive HPAT training? =20 No he did not. It appears that he was in control of the aircraft until = he became too slow and stalled/spun into the ground. While I do not = have all of the information at present, it appears that should he have = not have stalled, he might have survived the accident.=20 =20 Was his aircraft powered with a factory overhauled or new engine? =20 No it was not. =20 While none of these facts could singularly be determined to be the = reason for the crash or the fatality, all of these facts can be = interpreted as supportive of why Lancair and AIG insist on inspection, = training and conformity. It is not to control you or drive you from = experimental aircraft. It is instead to give you the best chance of = continuing to enjoy the finest high performance kit aircraft in the = world! =20 Joseph C. Bartels, CEO Lancair International, Inc. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C704CD.014FB55A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
=0A=
 
=0A=
 
=0A=
=0A=
Joseph C. Bartels, = CEO
=0A=
Lancair International, = Inc.
=0A=

=0A=
=0A= From: Joe Bartels
Sent: = Fri 11/10/2006 5:33 AM
Subject: turbines

=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Marv:
=0A=
 
=0A=
Please post the following:
=0A=
 
=0A=
Listers:
=0A=
 
=0A=
Lancair turbine crashes are as varied as the pilots = involved in those crashes.  I am extremely upset by each and every = one of those incidents.  We send representatives to virtually all = of the crash sites and assist the FAA and NTSB in the = investigations.  It is never easy to be part of that process, but, = it does help us all to better understand what happened so that we can = all further learn from the facts of that incident.
=0A=
 
=0A=
Years ago I began the process of working with the = insurance industry to put forth certain standards that would reduce the = number of accidents involving our aircraft.  Those standards = include 1) building the aircraft at Lancair OR = following its completion, having it inspected, for insurance purposes, = by one of our Lancair approved inspectors;  2)  that the = systems remain stock, that is, that there are no modifications to the = airframe which are not pre-approved by our engineering staff;  = 3)  that the owner/operator receive training through our Lancair = sponsored flight training program (HPATS).  That program includes = a)  initial training;  b) recurrency training 6 months = thereafter;  c)  recurrency training 6 months thereafter; and, = d)  annually thereafter.  This was not a singular system = thought of by myself or anyone at Lancair for the purpose of limiting = the experimental enjoyment of the airframe.  It was so that AIG = Insurance would provide coverage to a series of aircraft that, to that = point, had not and would not have received airframe = coverage.
=0A=
 
=0A=
While training does not guarantee safe operation of an = aircraft, it greatly improves the chances that the pilot will fly as he = has been trained, and in the face of an emergency will survive.  =
=0A=
 
=0A=
What happened in Georgia? 
=0A=
 
=0A=
Simply put, there was a fuel starvation problem that = should have resulted in a safe landing when following standard training = taught by HPAT. 
=0A=
 
=0A=
What caused the fuel starvation problem?
=0A=
 
=0A=
This aircraft had a non-standard fuel system which = incorporated two fuel control valves and a rear mounted auxiliary = tank.
=0A=
 
=0A=
Was this system approved by Lancair?
=0A=
 
=0A=
No it was not.
=0A=
 
=0A=
Did the pilot receive HPAT training?
=0A=
 
=0A=
No he did not.  It appears that he was in control of = the aircraft until he became too slow and stalled/spun into the = ground.  While I do not have all of the information at present, it = appears that should he have not have stalled, he might have = survived the accident. 
=0A=
 
=0A=
Was his aircraft powered with a factory overhauled or new = engine?
=0A=
 
=0A=
No it was not.
=0A=
 
=0A=
While none of these facts could singularly be determined = to be the reason for the crash or the fatality, all of these facts can = be interpreted as supportive of why Lancair and AIG insist on = inspection, training and conformity.  It is not to control you or = drive you from experimental aircraft.  It is instead to give you = the best chance of continuing to enjoy the finest high performance kit = aircraft in the world!
=0A=
 
=0A=
=0A=
Joseph C. Bartels, = CEO
=0A=
Lancair International, = Inc.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C704CD.014FB55A--