X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:37:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.240.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.6) with ESMTP id 1466409 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:29:05 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.37; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061014202844.XIFV10599.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:28:44 -0400 Received: from OFFICE ([72.192.254.103]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id aLUN1V00p2EdYPc0000000 Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:28:25 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <001001c6efcf$55fcfdf0$6401a8c0@OFFICE> From: "Bill&Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Cc: "BILL HANNAHAN" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 320 vs 360 X-Original-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:28:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01C6EFAD.CEB6E070" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C6EFAD.CEB6E070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We've had the Lasar on since first flight so we can't tell you what the = difference would be. In general, I can beat the Lycoming manual by = somewhere around a gallon an hour or so. Bill=20 Congratulations on your very impressive numbers!=20 Did you fly with magnetos first, if so how much difference did you = see. At the low rpm's I fly, the ideal advance angle would probably be = close to my mag's 25 deg, but it would likely run smooth on a leaner = mixture. Great job handling the bird strike, hope you are back in the air soon. Posted for "Bill&Sue" <5zq@cox.net>: Hour 1 burn: 6.8 (including taxi, t.o. and climb) Hour 2 burn: 4.8 Hour 3 burn: 4.9 Hour 4 burn: 4.6 Average cruise economy: 34.4 nautical mpg 39.6 statute mpg Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1,250 hrs N6ZQ IV in progress BILL HANNAHAN=20 WFHANNAHAN@YAHOO.COM -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C6EFAD.CEB6E070 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We've had the Lasar on since first = flight so we=20 can't tell you what the difference would be. In general, I can beat the = Lycoming=20 manual by somewhere around a gallon an hour or = so.
 
Bill
 
 
Congratulations on your very impressive numbers!
 
Did you fly with magnetos first, if so how much difference did = you=20 see.
 
At the low rpm's I fly, the ideal advance angle would probably be = close=20 to my mag's 25 deg, but it would likely run smooth on a leaner = mixture.
 
Great job handling the bird strike, hope you are back in the air=20 soon.
 

Posted for "Bill&Sue"=20 <5zq@cox.net>:

Hour 1 burn: 6.8 (including taxi, t.o. and = climb)
Hour 2 burn: 4.8
Hour 3 burn: 4.9
Hour 4 burn:=20 4.6

Average cruise economy: 34.4 nautical mpg 39.6 statute=20 mpg


Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 1,250 hrs
N6ZQ IV in=20 progress





BILL HANNAHAN
WFHANNAHAN@YAHOO.COM

Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo!=20 Small Business. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C6EFAD.CEB6E070--