X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:34:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [128.102.31.41] (HELO arc.nasa.gov) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.6) with ESMTP id 1461391 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:28:02 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=128.102.31.41; envelope-from=Michael.S.Reinath@nasa.gov Received: from [143.232.160.68] ([143.232.160.68] verified) by pony1pub.arc.nasa.gov (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.10) with ESMTP id 30194556 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:27:36 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:27:31 -0700 X-Original-To: lml From: "Mike S. Reinath" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair driver make the AVWEB news Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" -- It's too bad that the NOTAM does not permit high performance singles to use the warbird pattern. There is already a high performance arrival in the NOTAM - 2,300 ft at 135 knots (or is it 130, I forget). I used it last year and this year. It worked fine for me both times, even after holding 1.5 hours after the accident this year in all the traffic. Why not just use this arrival? There is no need to use the warbird arrival. Mike Reinath LNC2 N3602M at 710 hrs TT San Jose, CA (RHV)