X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:55:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1370183 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:19:46 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.28; envelope-from=warbirdaeropress@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060908181903.FKGZ13992.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:19:03 -0400 Received: from DellXPS ([24.251.75.43]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id KuJt1V00H0w2xio0000000 Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:18:56 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <014701c6d373$3ccaa0d0$6401a8c0@DellXPS> From: "Scotty G" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Props X-Original-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:18:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0144_01C6D338.8E809AA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0144_01C6D338.8E809AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been in the prop zone for a little while now in regards to = Unleashed, my Lancair 360. I now have the Superior XP-400 on the = airplane. We're supposed to run a MT racing prop... My experience with = MT so far has been poor. As the pilot of the airplane and the one's = whose butt is in the seat, I found their rep's attitude and demeanor = poor at best. Then I come to find out that their prop begain to = delaminate at high rpm - where we are going to run. On the other hand, Hartzell came to me and wanted to sponsor me. They = gave me a new prop and always treated me with respect and courtesy. I = trust in and believe their product and their attitude towards safety. A few final thoughts: apples to apples, and MT prop has never gone = faster than a Hartzell at Reno. I also got answers and data from = Hartzell when I asked, while the MT rep refused to give me any data on = their race prop they were building for me. Having said that, I think it = would be fair to say that there are some / a lot of people that have had = very good experiences with MT and like their propeller choice. Scotty G UnleashedAirRacing.com SeptemberPops.com WarbirdAeroPress.com ------=_NextPart_000_0144_01C6D338.8E809AA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have been in the prop zone for a = little while=20 now in regards to Unleashed, my Lancair 360. I now have the Superior = XP-400 on=20 the airplane. We're supposed to run a MT racing prop... My experience = with MT so=20 far has been poor. As the pilot of the airplane and the one's whose butt = is in=20 the seat, I found their rep's attitude and demeanor poor at best. Then I = come to=20 find out that their prop begain to delaminate at high rpm - where we are = going=20 to run.

On the other hand, Hartzell came to me = and wanted=20 to sponsor me. They gave me a new prop and always treated me with = respect and=20 courtesy. I trust in and believe their product and their attitude = towards=20 safety.

A few final thoughts: apples to = apples, and MT=20 prop has never gone faster than a Hartzell at Reno. I also got answers = and data=20 from Hartzell when I asked, while the MT rep refused to give me any data = on=20 their race prop they were building for=20 me. Having said that, I think it would be fair = to say=20 that there are some / a lot of people that have had very good = experiences with=20 MT and like their propeller choice.

Scotty=20 G
UnleashedAirRacing.com
SeptemberPops.com
WarbirdAeroPress.com<= /FONT>

------=_NextPart_000_0144_01C6D338.8E809AA0--