X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:09:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web61315.mail.yahoo.com ([209.73.179.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with SMTP id 1369664 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 09:11:25 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.73.179.84; envelope-from=charliekohler@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 17476 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Sep 2006 13:10:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Q+ElThEDTEaM/fLS+gOnMZfBORNBsvOcDc2OQqVwMhg5xbDyDhtuSdgjFjVYPyh7QNqZbm6NfAN1ZKcIcu0oXDMeo/SiAPQydfWMoBthzzPy4KFAw/K4Qjd7/jA2WdzHD9PYFEoZJvEEIjlPubjaWRFrWs+VPsyeSmfIrEoyXZ8= ; X-Original-Message-ID: <20060908131042.17474.qmail@web61315.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.202.95.219] by web61315.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 06:10:42 PDT X-Original-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 06:10:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Charlie Kohler Reply-To: Charlie Kohler Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Over flight X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1248464044-1157721042=:15586" --0-1248464044-1157721042=:15586 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Barry--- Seems you are right, they are tightening warbird restrictions. =20 =20 "The Phoenix Manufacturing Inspection District Office (MIDO) denied an appl= ication for an airworthiness certificate for an L-39 aircraft, ------------= ---------- The Federal Aviation Administrations policy prohibits the brokerage of expe= rimental aircraft. The following excerpt was taken from FAA Order 8130.2F, = Paragraph 157: "Section 21.191(d) was not intended to allow for the broker= ing or marketing of experimental aircraft. This includes individuals who=C2= =85import=C2=85and then apply for and receive experimental exhibition airwo= rthiness certificates so they can sell the aircraft to buyers=C2=85Certific= ating offices must ensure that all applications for exhibition airworthines= s certificates are for the purposes specified under =C2=A7 21.191(d), and a= re from the registered owners who will exhibit the aircraft for those purpo= ses=C2=85" =20 Charlie K.=20 ----- Original Message ---- From: Marvin Kaye To: Lancair Mailing List Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 7:54:17 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Over flight Posted for Barry Hancock : This is a critical issue, indeed. It is aimed primarily at jet warbirds= =20 out of the Van Nuys FDSO, but has the potential to effect us all. If you thin= k that you can sit back and watch, think again. The Long Beach FSDO has ver= y effectively removed jet warbirds from all of it's airports and makes it na= sty for any experimental (exhibition category, particularly) to base at one of it's airports. =20 Support the EAA and AOPA....AND write your political leaders to bring th= is to their attention...now is NOT the time to put our collective heads in th= e sand. =20 Cheers, =20 Barry =20 =20 =20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/ --0-1248464044-1157721042=:15586 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Barry---

Seems you are right, they are tightening warbird restrictions.&nb= sp;

"The Phoenix Manufacturing Inspection District Office (MIDO) denied an= application for an airworthiness certificate for an L-39 aircraft, -------= ---------------
The Federal Aviation Administrations policy prohibits th= e brokerage of experimental aircraft. The following excerpt was taken from = FAA Order 8130.2F, Paragraph 157: "Section 21.191(d) was not int= ended to allow for the brokering or marketing of experimental aircraft. Thi= s includes individuals who=C2=85import=C2=85and then apply for and receive = experimental exhibition airworthiness certificates so they can sell the air= craft to buyers=C2=85Certificating offices must ensure that all application= s for exhibition airworthiness certificates are for the purposes specified = under =C2=A7 21.191(d), and are from the registered owners who will exhibit= the aircraft for those purposes=C2=85"

Charlie K.

----- Original Message ----
From: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancair= online.net>
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 7:54:17 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Over flig= ht

Posted for Barry Hancock <sportform@cox.net>:

  = ;This is a critical issue, indeed.  It is aimed primarily at jet&= nbsp; warbirds
out
of the Van Nuys FDSO, but has the potential = to effect us  all.  If you think
that you can sit ba= ck and watch, think again.  The  Long Beach FSDO has ve= ry
effectively removed jet warbirds from all of  it's airports= and makes it nasty
for any experimental (exhibition  category= , particularly) to base at one of
it's airports.

&nbs= p; Support the EAA and AOPA....AND write your political leaders to bri= ng  this
to their attention...now is NOT the time to put our c= ollective  heads in the
sand.

  C= heers,

  Barry

  =


--
For archives and unsub http://m= ail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/

--0-1248464044-1157721042=:15586--