Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:51:14 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1369538@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.166.217.30; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
From: "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
References: <list-1368066@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Props
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dan - I looked at this a couple years ago.
It appeared at the time that the NEWEST hartzell scimitar is if slower, not 
very much slower than than anything else out there.
If you search at lmlonline for props you will find various posts from which 
you can piece together your own opinion.

I have the full feathering version.   I was adamant about having it. 
Haven't flown it yet.  but if you look through all those posts you will find 
an attachment somewhere that shows the glide ratio of non-windmilling 
"coarse pitch" vs. fully feathered.   There's not a lot of difference! 
...and given the typical CG on a legacy, I would think you would be better 
off without full feathering.

As for MT,  I ran into a guy at lunch today that knew the legacy driver that 
lost a prop blade at orange county new jersey.  it sounded like it was an MT 
but I don't have the facts.  Maybe one of the safety experts on lml can 
comment.

Colyn


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/