X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [24.51.79.189] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1c.3)
  with HTTP id 1360569 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:11:22 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Garmin GNS480 compared to Garmin 530
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1c.3
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:11:22 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1360569@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <8984A39879F2F5418251CBEEC9C689B3286757@lucky.dts.local>
References: <8984A39879F2F5418251CBEEC9C689B3286757@lucky.dts.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



Posted for "Chuck Jensen" <cjensen@dts9000.com>:

  Simple break points for the decision.
  
  430 VFR with occasional light IFR (don't even bother flaming about
  'light'!) and a lot of 'direct'
  530 VFR with more regular IFR
  480 IFR on a regular basis, especially in complex air space (northeast,
  southern CA)
  
  As Ron mentioned, the 480 combined with the MX20 (or the MX200, a new
  iteration), is a powerful combination that once familiar with the menus
  system, is very intuitive and much more user friendly than the 430/530.
  
  Chuck Jensen