X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:57:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1321024 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:05:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.246.73; envelope-from=jimmem@msn.com Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.161.42]) by bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:05:12 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:05:11 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:05:07 GMT X-Originating-IP: [69.106.235.67] X-Originating-Email: [jimmem@msn.com] X-Sender: jimmem@msn.com In-Reply-To: From: "Jim Memmer" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net X-Original-Bcc: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: 4 pt speeds X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:05:07 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2006 21:05:11.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A5C7650:01C6BF1C] X-Original-Return-Path: jimmem@msn.com

Its true, the Walter 601D engine does not have enough bleed air to pressurize by itself. By introducing the Beech king air pressure pack for approx. $4500. from Diemech Turbines in Deland Florida, the Walter 601D can pressurize easily. See Diemechturbines.com   jim memmer Lancair 4PT 65 hours


From:  Douglas Kay <lmlturbineexe@yahoo.com>
Reply-To:  "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
To:  "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject:  [LML] Re: 4 pt speeds
Date:  Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:33:10 -0400

Ok, why is this... according to Lancair,, the D won't pressurize the plane.
  
Is anything that they told me true?
  
Why would they lie about this stuff anyway?
  
Joe B,, your not a liar are you?
  
What makes this plane faster?
  
D.

reddog <reddog@bentonrea.com> wrote:
  
         
  
In my last post I forgot to mentioned  that the 290 knts was the fastest  time for the e engine on www.flightaware.com  Most of the times they were around 260 knts to 270 knts   I could also help by divulging the tail numbers John Cooks  - N213JC is faster by as much as 50 knts       /       others are N420M   /  N9xW   / 750LC  take a look for yourself and see the difference
  
                                                                    
                                                                                                                Bill Maddox


Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.