X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:57:19 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.137.3] (HELO imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1321012 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:45:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.3; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.bb8.42262da (14457) for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:44:33 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:44:32 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] LIV - Rudder Trim X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1155501872" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5031 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1155501872 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/13/2006 2:32:24 PM Central Standard Time, npaczkowski@telus.net writes: The manual indicates that rudder trim is optional. Is there a consensus on whether rudder trim is worth the effort? Thanks. get it... -------------------------------1155501872 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 8/13/2006 2:32:24 PM Central Standard Time,=20 npaczkowski@telus.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>

The manual indicates that ru= dder=20 trim is optional. Is there a consensus on whether rudder trim is worth the= =20 effort? Thanks.

get it...
-------------------------------1155501872--