Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:19:59 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1315227@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.203; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net
From: "terrence o'neill" <troneill@charter.net>
Subject: Fw: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To others on the list,
    May  I point oout that Hamid's response is irrational?  For those who 
haven't already noticed,
in logic it's a tactic called 'begging the question'.
    What Hamid is doing is assuming his position is correct, without 
presenting any evidence or data.
    Then he is con ducting a personal attack to discredit me, again without 
presenting any evidence, but rather just casting aspersions upon my 
character.
    Hamid is being naughty, and should consider offering an apology.

Terrence

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "terrence o'neill" <troneill@charter.net>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 08:00 AM
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting...


> Dear Hamid,
> That's a lot of colorful prose, and personal attacking,  just to disagree 
> with my opinions.
> Ate you a mecal certified psychoanalyst, or just an admirer of Karl Rove?
> Terrence
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Hamid A. Wasti" <hwasti@starband.net>
> To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:59 PM
> Subject: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting...
>
>
>> terrence o'neill wrote:
>>> The intent was to say that the airlines are not much safer than GenAv in 
>>> spite of the fact that they have all these extra benefits: compete FAA 
>>> congtrol of movement, latest technology, maxim um training, excellent 
>>> experience ... as compared to the week-end Airknocker pilot.
>> Terrence,
>>
>> I believe you have a fundamental disconnect with reality if you believe 
>> that part 121 flying is not much safer than the part 91 flying.  The 
>> accident data shows the difference to be more than an order of magnitude.
>>
>> Let me change the topic here for a second.  I have not had a chance to 
>> look through the archives to review everything that you have written, but 
>> I do not recall pegging you as blatantly out of touch with reality. 
>> However, recently you have come across as a tin foil hat wearing, black 
>> helicopter fearing, government microchip implanted in the butt kind of 
>> militia man from around here in the back woods of Idaho.  Your spelling 
>> and grammar have gone to hell, not to mention the logical content of your 
>> e-mails.  The spelling and grammar are deteriorating with each e-mail as 
>> is your grasp of reality.
>> Terrence this is a serious suggestion, not a rhetorical one: Go and get 
>> yourself checked out medically.  There are a number of medical conditions 
>> where the first symptom is a change in cognitive state.  Usually the 
>> change happens at a much slower pace (months and years) for chronic 
>> conditions and at a much faster pace (over a matter of minutes or hours) 
>> for acute conditions, but what we are seeing from you is still 
>> troublesome.  Please do yourself and those that care about you a great 
>> favor and go see a doctor.  And please do all pilots a favor and ground 
>> yourself till you get a medical clearance -- there is clearly something 
>> going on that needs evaluation.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hamid
>>
>>
>> --
>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
>>
>