Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #36892
From: terrence o'neill <troneill@charter.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting...
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:17:55 -0400
To: <lml>
Robert,
Sounds reasonable to me.
Terrence
----- Original Message -----
From: Lancair
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:56 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting...

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Barry Hancock
Subject: [LML] Re: response to Terrence O'Neill's posting...
Anecdotally, think of how many people you know or have heard of dying in GA accidents and compare that to how many people you know have died in airliners.   
 
My grandparents were killed in a car accident (drunk driver hit them) and my uncle was hit by a train (engineer's blood alcohol not tested), but so far no relatives have died from a GA aircraft related injury.  So GA must be much safer than cars and trains.  Or maybe we need a different sampling. 
 
A better comparison for airlines would be commercial bus transport - the Greyhound.  Airliners are essentially buses with wings (Ralph Cramden PIC) and GA aircraft are automobiles with wings.  Except for the mountains in South America buses are rarely associated with fatalies whereas we have perhaps 40k to 50k automobile fatalities per year in the US alone.  Buses seem to be safer than cars but we all choose a car 99% of the time and accept the risk.  We minimize that risk by avoiding alcohol (bus drivers of both types take note), do not run red lights, travel at a safe speed, etc.  I believe that if we were to sift out all the GA accidents caused by moronic behavior that the remainder would render a safety record a whole lot closer to 121 travel. 
 
Robert M. Simon
ES-P N301ES
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster