X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.58.236] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1c.2)
  with HTTP id 1225635 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 01:07:33 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Ceramic Exhaust
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1c.2
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 01:07:33 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1225635@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1FyDGb-0006Bm-Gp@elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <E1FyDGb-0006Bm-Gp@elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "richard  titsworth" <rtitsworth@mindspring.com>:

  Walter, etal,
  
  Some of the posts here speak of coating both the inside and outside of the
  pipes.
  
  Just curious... Is it possible to only coat the inside?  Or coat both and
  then remove the coating from the outside?
  
  Seems only coating the inside would reduce the heat transferred "into" the
  metal and would retain the original ability of the metal to dissipate heat
  outward.
  
  If the goal was to reduce the heat radiated from the pipe, only coating the
  inside would (may) reduce the heat (temp) that the pipe has to radiate.
  i.e. Rather than coating the outside and holding the heat in the pipe, why
  not coat the inside and reduce the heat transferred into the pipe in the
  first place.
  
  Rick